Hub networks designed on data, defended by it.
For municipalities, planning consultancies, and operators building shared mobility networks at city or regional scale.
The problem
Hub networks are built as networks. They can't be scouted one site at a time.
Dense hub networks aren't built one site at a time. They're built as networks — coverage, walking-distance thresholds, integration with public transport, parking pressure, neighbourhood character. The decisions are political as much as technical, and they need underpinning that holds in council chambers and public consultations.
Locata supports network-level design with both site-level scoring and coverage-scenario evaluation. The output is the same shape: ranked candidates with reasoning, but framed against the scenario the network is being designed for.
What Locata does
Four use cases, one platform.
Same scoring backbone applied to the decisions hubs teams make every quarter.
Network coverage scenarios
What does a 20-hub network cover? A 35-hub network? Compare scenarios on coverage, cost, and stakeholder fit — with reasoning attached so council can see the tradeoff, not just the result.
Site-level scoring
Per hub: resident density, modal split, public-transport proximity, parking pressure, redevelopment context. Every candidate ranked against the same network-design objective.
Public opposition risk
Same NIMBY-screening logic as our utility work, applied at hub scale. Surface objection risk in the screening round so it informs the network design, not the consultation phase.
Consultation-ready dossiers
Per-hub reasoning formatted for inclusion in public consultations and council documents. Defensible against the inevitable 'why this corner, not that one' question.
Data we connect
The sources behind every score.
Hub network design draws on demographic, transit, and political-geography layers in roughly equal measure — the data mix is closer to urban planning than infrastructure rollout.
See the full enrichment list for cadence and coverage.
BAG
Buildings, residences, frontage per candidate parcel.
CBS demographics
Resident density, age, household type, modal split.
NS/ProRail station data
Public transit proximity and integration scoring.
Municipal open data
Parking pressure, mobility plans, redevelopment zones.
OpenStreetMap
Road network, cycle infrastructure, POI density.
Parking pressure datasets
Per-block parking utilization where published.
What a report looks like
Per-hub scoring with the scenario behind it.
Every candidate hub ships with its own reasoning — and the coverage scenario it's evaluated against. Switch scenarios, see the same candidate score differently with the rationale that changed.
[ schematic preview — real per-customer screenshots withheld ]
Pricing
Predictable, per-project or annual.
Per project or annual subscription. City-scale design pilots are typically project-based; consultancies retain Locata on subscription for ongoing client work.
Project pilot
from €15,000
Fixed scope, fixed price. Defined region, defined deliverable, defined timeline.
Ongoing subscription
from €2,500/month
For programs running on a refresh cadence. Includes integration support and prompt iteration.
How we start
How we start.
A typical engagement opens with one city or one district — a scenario evaluation across two or three candidate network sizes — so you can see how the methodology handles the political reality of hub siting before scaling it across a region.
- 01Week 1: scenario definitions + scoring prompt
- 02Week 2: scoring run + scenario comparison
- 03Week 3: consultation-ready dossier per hub
FAQ
Shared mobility: common questions.
What is Locata for shared mobility hubs?
Locata is a network-design platform for shared mobility hubs. It scores candidate locations against resident density, modal split, public transit proximity, parking pressure, and redevelopment context — and evaluates coverage scenarios across network sizes so council can see the tradeoff, not just the recommendation.Who uses Locata for hub networks?
Municipalities designing city-scale hub networks, planning consultancies delivering hub-network projects to gemeente clients, and shared mobility operators planning regional rollouts. The workflow is the same; the customer determines the political weight applied during scoring.What's the difference between site-level scoring and coverage scenarios?
Site-level scoring ranks individual candidate hubs against the network objective. Coverage scenarios evaluate the network as a whole — what does a 20-hub network cover versus a 35-hub network, in walking-distance terms and modal-split impact. Both run through the same scoring backbone.What data does Locata use for hub planning?
BAG (residences and frontage), CBS demographics (density, age, modal split), NS/ProRail station data (public transit proximity), municipal open data (parking pressure, mobility plans, redevelopment zones), OpenStreetMap (road and cycle network, POI density), and parking pressure datasets where published.Are Locata reports defensible in public consultation?
Yes. Per-hub reasoning is formatted for inclusion in public consultations and council documents. Every score traces back to its inputs, the methodology is auditable, and we surface public-opposition risk in the screening round so it informs the network design, not the consultation phase.What does Locata cost for mobility hub work?
Pilots from €15,000 fixed-scope for a single-city or single-district scenario evaluation. Ongoing subscriptions from €2,500/month for consultancies running multiple client engagements concurrently.
Related reading
More context on how Locata works and where it fits.
Multi-model AI scoring, explained.
Why three frontier models score every Locata candidate independently — and why disagreement between them is more informative than any single confidence number.
ReadArgumentWhy location is the bottleneck of the energy transition.
Capacity, hardware, and finance are all scaling. The constraint that's eating the calendar is permitting — and permitting starts with site selection.
ReadComparisonAI location intelligence tools in Europe
How Locata compares to the small set of AI-driven location tools with European data depth.
CompareComparisonBest site selection software 2026
Nine tools compared honestly — what each is best for, what it costs, where it falls short.
CompareTry it on your data
See Locata on hubs candidates.
30 minutes, online. Bring a sample candidate set — we'll run a live scoring with full reasoning per location.